Q: How much acceleration of vesting upon a change in control do Series-A startups typically offer?

Mary Russell counsels individual employees and founders to negotiate, maximize and monetize their stock options and other startup stock. She is an attorney and the founder of Stock Option Counsel.

A: Startup would not likely offer accelerated vesting upon change of control without you asking for it. But acceleration is usually a negotiable term for anyone in mid to senior roles. 

If you frame this negotiation as a discussion of your role and what you are being brought on to accomplish, it will get to the truth of the matter - What vesting makes sense for your position in the enterprise's future? All compensation - and especially vesting schedules - should make sense for what you are there to do. But startups might not take the time to look at it in that way. 

For example, a senior engineer was brought into a Series A startup to make a big push toward efficient operations. He was so successful at his job that the startup was "finished" with him after 6 months when the operations could be managed by junior engineers. He was on a four year vesting schedule with a one year cliff. Did it make sense that he would receive zero equity for doing an amazing job at exactly the job he was hired to do? No.

If the comapny wont agree to acceleration, ask for more shares to make up for the fact that you don't expect to earn the full number of shares in your grant.

Good luck. And watch out for the precise terms of your acceleration language to be sure they make sense as well.

Mary Russell counsels individual employees and founders to negotiate, maximize and monetize their stock options and other startup stock. She is an attorney and the founder of Stock Option Counsel.

Tax Deduction Reminder & Stock Option Counsel Updates

 

Stock Option Counsel

Legal Services for Individuals

Thanks for a great year with Stock Option Counsel.

Reminder - Tax Deduction for Legal Fees

Your legal fees may be deductible on your tax return. Check with your tax advisor for more information. 

Update - Stock Option Counsel Services for Employees & Founders

Please keep us in mind as a resource for yourself and your friends and colleagues for guidance on:

  • Job offers, equity grants and employment agreements
  • Stock option exercise and tax choices
  • Sales of employee stock on the secondary market
  • Post-acquisition employment agreements
  • Founders' interests at incorporation, financings, and exits
  • Dispute resolution among founders and employees on startup equity

Our Blog - Articles and Videos on Employee Equity

We use the Stock Option Counsel Blog to share information on negotiating job offers and selling startup stock. Please send us any requests for additions to the blog. Here's some links to our most popular posts:

Joining An Early Stage Startup? Equity Tips

Bull's Eye - Negotiating the Right Job Offer

RSUs - Startup Restricted Stock Units

MARY RUSSELL • ATTORNEY-AT-LAW 

125 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 220 • PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301

INFO@STOCKOPTIONCOUNSEL.COM • (650) 326-3412

©2014 STOCK OPTION COUNSEL • DISCLAIMER

Startup Negotiations: How Preferred Stock Makes Employee Stock Less Valuable

Mary Russell counsels individual employees and founders to negotiate, maximize and monetize their stock options and other startup stock. She is an attorney and the founder of Stock Option Counsel.

If you have a job offer from a startup with an option to purchase shares representing 1% of the company, you may want to consider the Preferred Stock "Liquidation Preference" to see if your 1% would really be 1% if the company is acquired. If the Liquidation Preference is high, you might want to negotiate for more shares to make up for the loss in value you can expect when the company is acquired.

Common Stock v. Preferred Stock

As a startup employee, you'll be getting Common Stock (as options, RSUs or restricted stock). When venture capitalists invest in startups, they receive Preferred Stock. Preferred Stock comes with the right to preferential treatment in merger payouts, voting rights, and dividends. If the company / founders have caved and given venture capitalists a lot of preferred rights - like a 3X Liquidation Preference or Participating Preferred Stock , those rights will dramatically reduce your payouts in an acquisition.

Liquidation Preference & How It Makes Employee Stock Less Valuable

One Preferred Stock right is a "Liquidation Preference." Without a Liquidation Preference, each stockholder – preferred or common – would receive a percentage of the acquisition price equal to the stockholder's percentage ownership in the company. If the company were acquired for $15 million, and an employee owned 1% of the company, the employee would be paid out $150,000.

With a Liquidation Preference, preferred stockholders are guaranteed to be paid a set dollar amount of the acquisition price, even if that guaranteed payout is greater than their percentage ownership in the company.

Here’s an example of the difference. An investor buys 5 million shares of Preferred Stock for $1 per share for a total of $5 million. After the financing, there are 20 million shares of common stock and 5 million shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. The company is then acquired for $15 million.                                                                                                                           

Without a Liquidation Preference, each stockholder (common or preferred) would receive $0.60 per share. That’s $15 million / 25 million shares. A hypothetical employee who held 1% of the company or 250000 shares) would receive $150,000 (that’s 1% of $15 million).

If the preferred stockholders had a 1X Liquidation Preference and Non-Participating Preferred Stock, they would receive 1X their investment ($5 million) before any Common Stock is paid in an acquisition. They would receive the first $5 million of the acquisition price, and the remaining $10 million would be divided among the 20 million shares of common stock outstanding ($10 million / 20 million shares of common stock). Each common stockholder would be paid $0.50 per share, and hypothetical employee who held 1% of the company would receive $125,000.

Ugly, Non-Standard Rights That Diminish Employee Stock Value

The standard Liquidation Preference is 1X. This makes sense, as the investors expect to receive their investment dollars back before employees and founders are rewarded for creating value. But some company founders give preferred stockholders multiple Liquidation Preferences or Participation Rights that cut more dramatically into employee stock payouts in an acquisition.

If preferred stockholders had a 3X Liquidation Preference, they would be paid 3X their original investment before common stock was paid out. In this example, preferred would be paid 3X their $5 million investment for a total of $15 million, and the common stockholders would receive $0. ($15 million acquisition price – $15 million Liquidation Preference = $0 paid to common stockholders)

Preferred stock may also have "Participation Rights," which would change our first example above to give preferred stockholders an even larger portion of the acquisition price.

Without Participation Rights, Preferred Stockholders must choose to either receive their Liquidation Preference or participate in the division of the full acquisition price among the all stockholders. In the first example above, the preferred stockholders held 20% of the company and had a $5 million Liquidation Preference. When the company was acquired for $15 million, the preferred stockholders had the choice to receive their $5 million liquidation preference or to participate in an equal distribution of the proceeds to all stockholders. The equal distribution would have given them $3 million (20% of $15 million acquisition price), so they chose to take their $5 million liquidation preference, and the remaining $10 million was divided among 20 million shares of common stock.

If the Preferred Stock also had Participation Rights, (which is called Participating Preferred Stock), they would receive their Liquidation Preference and participate in the distribution of the remaining proceeds.

In our example with a 1X Liquidation Preference but adding a Participation Right, the Participating Preferred Stock would receive their $5 million Liquidation Preference AND a portion of the remaining $10 million of the acquisition price equal to their % ownership in the company.

$5 million Liquidation Preference + ((5 million shares / 25 million shares outstanding) * $10 million) = $7 million

Common stockholders would receive (20 million shares common stock / 25 million shares outstanding) * $10 million = $8 million.

Our hypothetical employee who held 1% of the company would receive $100,000 (.01 * $10 million) or 0.67% of the acquisition price.

Employee Focus – Calculating Your Payout

If you are an employee of a startup, you can use Liquidation Preference as shorthand for the minimum price the company would have to be acquired for before any employees would be paid out. 

If the acquisition price is less than the Liquidation Preference, common stockholders will get $0 in the acquisition.

If you want to go further and understand what you would be paid out if the acquisition price is more than the Liquidation Preference, consider these three scenarios:

If the preferred stockholders have Participating Preferred Stock, Your Payout = (Acquisition Price – Liquidation Preference) * Your % of All Outstanding Stock

If the preferred stockholders have Non-Participating Preferred Stock, you will receive the lower of:

Your Payout = (Acquisition Price – Liquidation Preference) * Your % of Common Stock OR

Your Payout = Acquisition Price * Your % Ownership

Employee Focus – What to Ask the Company

These calculations are complicated, so if you are evaluating a job offer you might want to stay out of these details leave it up to the company to tell you how the Liquidation Preference would affect you in an acquisition. Use these questions to understand how the Liquidation Preference would reduce the value of your common stock in an acquisition. Simply ask the CFO these questions:

1. What is the total Liquidation Preference? Do the investors have Participation Rights?

2. If the company were purchased today at the most recent VC valuation, what would my shares be worth?

3. If the company were purchased today at 2X the most recent VC valuation, what would my shares be worth? 

3. If the company were purchased today at 10X the most recent VC valuation, what would my shares be worth?

This will give you a good feel for how heavy the VC Liquidation Preferences are and how they would weigh down the growth in value of the common stock.

Founder Focus – Negotiating Your Acquisition Payout

If you are a founder and are negotiating with an acquiror, consider renegotiating your investors’ Liquidation Preference payout. Everything is negotiable in an acquisition, including the division of the acquisition price among founders, investors and employees. Do not get pushed around by your investors here, as their rights in the documents do not have to determine their payout.

If your investors are pushing to receive the full Liquidation Preference and leaving you and/or your employees with a small cut of the payout, address this with your investment bankers. They may be able to help you play your acquiror against the investors so that you are not cut out of the wealth of the deal, as most acquirors want the founders and employees to receive enough of the acquisition price to inspire them to stay with the company after acquisition.

Mary Russell is an attorney and the founder of Stock Option Counsel. You are invited to contact Stock Option Counsel for help in negotiating and evaluating your job offers and post-acquisition employment agreements, making stock option exercise and tax decisions and identifying your rights and opportunities to sell startup stock. 

Thanks to investment banker Michael Barker for his comments on founder merger negotiations. Michael is a Managing Director at Shea & Company, LLC,  a technology-focused investment bank and leading strategic advisor to the software industry.

VIDEO Startup Stock Options: Exercise Price Basics

Stock Option Counsel for individual employees and founders in all matters relating to startup stock options or other employee stock. This video describes stock options in a simple, accessible way. Call us when you want to evaluate, maximize or monetize your stock options or other startup stock. (650) 326-3412. www.stockoptioncounsel.com. info@stockoptioncounsel.com.

Startup Stock: Particles and Waves. Casinos and Creativity.

Photo: Bobby Mikul

Photo: Bobby Mikul

Mary Russell counsels individual employees and founders to negotiate, maximize and monetize their stock options and other startup stock. She is an attorney and the founder of Stock Option Counsel.

What is a corporation? Finance pros and justice types present two very different answers to that question.

On the finance side, a corporation is a casino-style financial arrangement between those who own stock. It divides up the rights to a financial return on capital. It emphasizes balance sheets and stock prices and risk and return to support the view that each corporation is a table in a casino that investors approach to place their investment bets and seek a financial return.

On the human advocacy side, a corporation is a living body made up of creative individuals. The liveliness of the group – defined to include investors, managers, employees, and, perhaps, the community or the earth – is the purpose of the corporation. They make comparisons to slavery, define externalities and articulate their values to support their view that a corporation is a living body that could not be owned.

Like a ray of light, which is at once a wave and a group of particles, the corporation is both a casino game for investors and a living, creative body. Evidence will always appear on both sides of this truth.

In choosing a career path and negotiating compensation, we use both perspectives. We find a place that has some life to it, to which our creative contribution can add life. But we tune into the casino view as well and seek compensation for the risk we take in joining the enterprise. This requires the eye of an investor who would look at the risks of the bet and the size of the possible return from every angle with the help of professionals in law, finance, technology, etc.

It would be distasteful to take this view of our work every day, but it must be done at some time. And it is best done with Stock Option Counsel. This blog will introduce the Stock Option Counsel perspective on the risk / investment that employees take / make in accepting stock options or other equity as compensation. It should be helpful to those evaluating their compensation and also reveal the points in time in which Stock Option Counsel can add value in this process.

Mary Russell counsels individual employees and founders to negotiate, maximize and monetize their stock options and other startup stock. She is an attorney and the founder of Stock Option Counsel. You are welcome to contact her at info@stockoptioncounsel or at (650) 326-3412.

Who is Mark Zuckerberg's Daddy?

Who is Mark Zuckerberg’s daddy? In a traditional public company, the CEO’s daddy is the board of directors who hire him, and the board’s daddy is the stockholder who can vote out the board. But Mr. Zuckerberg has voting control over the board and the power to define his own priorities.

So, who IS Mr. Zuckerberg’s daddy? He answered that question in yesterday’s interview with TechCrunch founder Mike Arrington with a subtle message to employees: The employee equity we grant you today, at today’s low prices/strike price with a four-year vesting schedule, will “pop” at the end of the vesting schedule.

Well, he didn’t say that exactly. But he led with that very clear (and obviously carefully crafted) message to employees by defining a remarkably specific timeline for stock price increase (remember, he always references vague future goals such as “build value over the long term” and “making the world more open and connected”):

“Over the next three to five years, I think the biggest question that is on everyone’s minds that will determine at least our performance over that period, is really going to be how well we do with mobile. … I think it’s easy for a lot of folks, without us being out there talking about the stuff we’re doing, to really underestimate how fundamentally good mobile is for us.”

Did someone ask him about the next three to five years? Not the interviewer. Not the public markets. Who cares about three to five yearsEmployees care about three to five years because they will receive grants of options or RSUs that will become fully vested in three to five years.

So Mr. Zuckerberg’s message to employees is this:

1. I know you care about the Facebook stock price in three to five years, because its delta over that time is your chance to build a fortune in compensation. If you’re not expecting a delta, you’ll place your bets (work) elsewhere.

2. I am thinking about the stock price in three to five years, because that is what you care about. I care about you. I have a plan, and it is going to benefit you directly.

3. The plan is mobile. Facebook is going to have a higher stock price in three to five years because of mobile.

4. Your employee equity is not worthless. It is going to gain value in the exact time frame in which you want it to gain value. And you will be rich.

So, Mr. Zuckerberg has declared what employees are betting on if they bet their workdays on Facebook employee equity. Will the best and brightest take the bet?